Texaco Independent Investigator's Report
Texaco released this report titled "Interim Report of Independent Counsel" appointed to investigate allegations that Texaco executives had used racial slurs in a meeting and discussed destroying documents. This interim report addressed the first of these allegations, concluding that an executives were misquoted and that the references to "black jelly beans" did not appear to have been intended as derogatory to African-Americans.
Note: The first item is the Texaco press release announcing the
publishing of the findings of the independent investigators hired by Texaco. It
is followed by the report itself, at the end of which appears a printed excerpt
from the controversial tapes of meetings between Texaco executives.
News from TEXACO
TEXACO RELEASES FINDINGS OF INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION
RELATED TO RACIAL EPITHETS
FOR RELEASE: MONDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 1996.
WHITE PLAINS, N.Y., Nov. 11 - Texaco Inc. today released the
findings of independent investigator Michael Armstrong into taped
conversations among four current and former employees of Texaco
released last week. Transcripts of the conversations were contained
in an affidavit filed by plaintiffs in the Roberts v. Texaco race
discrimination lawsuit. [Note: copies of the report and corrected
transcript are attached.]
Mr. Armstrong, former Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern
District of New York, was retained by Texaco to investigate taped
conversations and determine whether Texaco officials heard on the
tapes uttered racial epithets and destroyed or withheld documents.
The report released today is confined to the issue of racial epithets
only. Mr. Armstrong's investigation into the possible destruction or
withholding of documents is ongoing.
Peter I. Bijur, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Texaco, said,
"These preliminary findings merely set the record straight as to the
exact words spoken in the conversations, but they do not change the
categorically unacceptable context and tone of those conversations.
Nor do these findings change at all Texaco's unwavering responsibility
and commitment to eradicate discrimination thoroughly from our
company, wherever and however it exists.
"We remain unalterably committed to using this agonizing glare of the
spotlight as a catalyst to make Texaco a model in creating opportunity
and a tolerant workplace for all. Our clear, focused and critical
mission is to leave absolutely no doubt that all our people are
accorded the equal opportunity, dignified treatment and individual
respect to which every woman and man is entitled."
CONTACTS:
K. Peter Maneri 914-253-4181
Chris Gidez 914-253-6170
Jim Swords 914-253-4156
Memorandum To:
Stephen M. Turner
Senior Vice President and General Counsel Texaco, Inc.
From:
Michael Armstrong
Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, LLP New York, New York
Date: November 11, 1996
Re: INTERIM REPORT OF INDEPENDENT COUNSEL
INTRODUCTION
On Friday, November 1, 1996, I was retained by Texaco as Independent
Counsel to investigation allegations made in an affidavit filed by
Plaintiffs on October 28, 1996 in the Roberts vs. Texaco race
discrimination lawsuit. Attached to Plaintiffs' affidavit was a 9 page
transcript purporting to contain excerpts from taped conversations
surreptitiously recorded by Texaco finance department manager Richard
Lundwall during conversations between Lundwall and Texaco finance
department officials. I was retained to ascertain the truth or falsity
of allegations in the taped transcript excerpts that Texaco officials
(1) uttered racial epithets and (2) obstructed the document discovery
process in the Roberts litigation.
To assist in this project, I retained Decision Strategies
International, Inc., an investigative firm headed by Bart M. Schwartz,
former Chief of the Criminal Division in the United States Attorney's
office for the Southern District of New York.
We have been able to reach certain conclusions with respect to the
first of these assignments. You have asked me to report those
conclusions in this interim report.
The transcript filed by Plaintiffs contains four instances of remarks
with apparent racial connotations: (1) a statement characterizing
African-Americans as "fucking niggers"; (2) a statement, "you know how
black jelly beans agree***", followed by other remarks relating to
jelly beans; (3) references to an event at which African-Americans
allegedly sat through the playing of the United States National Anthem
while standing for a song presented as the Black National Anthem; and
(4) references to Hanukkah and Kwanzaa.
Public attention has focused almost exclusively on the first two of
these transcript references. With respect to these two references, our
investigation concludes: (1) that the words "fucking niggers" are not
on the tape and (2) that the references to jelly beans are in some
respects inaccurately recorded on Plaintiffs' transcripts and, in
context, do not constitute a racial slur.
1. Analysis of the Tapes
On Tuesday, November 5, 1996, Texaco was provided with copies of the
tapes from which the excerpts in the Plaintiffs' transcript were
derived. An additional version of the tapes was provided on Wednesday,
November 6. We concluded that the audibility of each of these copies
was unsatisfactory and undertook to obtain high quality copies which
could be professionally enhanced for maximum audibility.
On Thursday, November 7, we were given access by the Federal Bureau of
Investigation to the original microcassettes, which the Government had
obtained from the Plaintiffs. We retained Paul Ginsburg, President of
Professional Audio Laboratories, Inc., who, in the presence of a
Special Agent form the Federal Bureau of Investigation at the FBI's
offices in New Rochelle, New York, made a complete digital copy of the
tapes from the original. This digital copy was processed by Mr.
Ginsburg, who is a court-qualified expert in the enhancement, forensic
authentication and transcription of electronic tape recorded evidence.
Mr. Ginsburg is well known in the area of tape recording enhancement.
He has been retained, at various times, by many Federal investigative
agencies, the U.S. State Department, the U.S. Senate Special Committee
on Investigations, as well as agencies in the intelligence community.
Mr. Ginsburg was employed by the U.S. Department of Justice to enhance
the Branch Davidian FBI tapes. Mr. Ginsburg has also been a consultant
with all three major broadcasting networks and 25 news gathering
agencies and studios.
Mr. Ginsburg enhanced the recordings by using state of the art digital
processing techniques, including slowing the tape and electronically
restoring pitch to normal so as to improve the audibility and removing
ambient sounds that tended to mask the conversations and interfere
with the clarity of the recordings. These techniques in no way altered
the content of the tapes. The enhanced tapes were transcribed by a
team of stenographers, and portions were reviewed by Mr. Ginsburg.
Copies of the relevant portions of the tapes, together with
corresponding passages from the transcript filed by Plaintiffs, are
annexed hereto as Exhibit A.
2. The Specific Racial Epithet
The most inflammatory allegation in this investigation is the charge
that a Texaco executive, an a business meeting, used the epithet
"fucking niggers." The transcript of the taped conversation filed with
Plaintiffs' motion contains the following quote: "I'm still having
trouble with Hanukkah. Now we have Kwanzaa...(laughter by FIRST).
Fucking niggers they shitted all over us with this." (Plaintiffs'
Transcript, p.8).
The enhanced tapes reveal that Plaintiffs' transcript is in error. The
actual words on the tape are: "*** I'm still struggling with Hanukkah
and now we have Kwanzaa, I mean I lost Christmas, poor St. Nicholas,
they shitted all over his beard."
There is no use of the words "nigger" or "niggers" anywhere else in
the tapes.
3. References to Jelly Beans
Plaintiffs' transcript includes the following segment:
ULRICH: (Inaud.) ... I agree. This diversity thing. You know how black
jelly beans agree ....
LUNDWALL: That's funny. All the black jelly beans seem to be glued to
the bottom of the bag.
ULRICH: You can't have just we and them. You can't just have black
jelly beans and other jelly beans. It doesn't work.
LUNDWALL: Yeah. But they're perpetuating the black jelly beans.
(Plaintiffs' Transcript, p.7).
This passage has been publicly characterized as a derogatory reference
to African-Americans as "black jelly beans". The underlined phrase,
"you know how black jelly beans agree***" seems to support an
interpretation that the speaker was lumping African-Americans together
and gratuitously characterizing them as "jelly beans".
Mr. Ulrich, through his attorney Jonathan Rosner, a former Assistant
United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York, has
stated to us that the reference on the tape was not in any way
intended to be a racial slur. Mr. Rosner points out that the term
jelly bean is not, in and of itself, known to be a pejorative term,
and Mr. Ulrich did not have any reason to think that the reference
carried any such connotations. Mr. Rosner states that Mr. Ulrich's
reference to jelly beans was prompted by a speech given by an
African-American at a conference at which the speaker, advocating
integration and opposing separatist philosophies, illustrated his
remarks by analogizing to jars of jelly beans of many colors.
While Mr. Ulrich could not remember the name of the speaker to whom he
referred, we have identified Doctor R. Roosevelt Thomas, Jr. as the
probable source of the remarks alluded to by Mr. Ulrich. Dr. Thomas is
the founder and former President of the American Institute for
Managing Diversity, located at Morehouse College, Atlanta, Georgia. He
is currently President of R. Thomas & Associates. Dr. Thomas confirms
that in his speeches he customarily uses a jelly bean analogy, similar
to the one described by Mr. Ulrich, as a means of explaining the
concept of diversity. In his lecture, Dr. Thomas customarily uses
slide illustrations of different colored jelly beans in jars to
illustrate his points. Dr. Thomas remembers using this analogy during
a speech at which Texaco officials were, to his knowledge, in
attendance.
Dr. Thomas has also published articles containing this analogy. For
example, in an article written by Dr. Thomas entitled "Managing
Diversity: Utilizing the Talents Of The New Work Force" contained in
The Portable MBA in Management by Allan R. Cohen, published in 1993,
Dr. Thomas discusses his jelly bean analogy and reproduces his
illustrative slides. Attached as Exhibit B are excerpts from Dr.
Thomas's article and copies of his slides, as reproduced in this
article. Dr. Thomas also produced a video for American Media Inc.
located in Des Moines, Iowa, entitled "Dynamics of Diversity" in which
he employed the jelly bean analogy.
The enhanced tape supports Mr. Rosner's interpretation of his client's
remarks. While the Plaintiffs' transcript refers to a supposed
statement that black jelly beans "agree," the enhanced tape reveals
that the phrase in question is; "I*** I've heard that diversity thing.
We don't have black jelly beans or green ***" After an interruption,
Mr. Ulrich continues "*** you can't, you can't, you can't just have
'we' and 'them'. You can't have black jelly beans and other jelly
beans. *** it doesn't work."
There is nothing inherently derogatory in any of the references to
jelly beans on the enhanced tape. The remark by Mr. Lundwall, who was
taping the conversation, to black jelly beans being "glued to the
bottom of the bag" is an ambiguous reference, but may be a reference
to inequities imposed upon African-Americans by society, rather than a
criticism. Mr. Lundwall has not made himself available for interview.
4. References to the National Anthem, Kwanzaa and Hanukkah
The remaining two categories of references relating to racial subjects
do not appear to be different, in relevant part, in the enhanced tapes
as opposed to the Plaintiffs' transcripts.
CONCLUSION
We conclude, on the basis of professionally enhanced copies of the
tape recordings at issue, that the words "fucking niggers" were not
spoken during the recorded conversations of Texaco executives, and the
references to "jelly beans" do not appear to us to have been intended
as a racial slur.
EXHIBIT A
INDEPENDENT COUNSEL (MICHAEL ARMSTRONG) TRANSCRIPT
NOVEMBER 10, 1996
Note: In the following excerpt, 'MV' means 'Male Voice'.
* * *
Ulrich: ... the pendulum's swinging the other way guys I hate to tell
you.
LUNDWALL: They're perpetuating an us/them atmosphere. Las week last
Friday - -
MV: -- yeah you told me yeah but --
(unintelligible brief discussion, several voices) .. yeah... I say
that group I said.... and outside...
LUNDWALL: Imagine that's when I said to you, you want a frag grenade
you know duck I'm going to throw one, well that's what I was alluding
to, but the point is, now that's not bad in itself, but, it does
perpetuate, us/them --
MV: Yeah
LUNDWALL: (continuing) -- and if you're trying to get away from and
get to the we, you can't do that kind of stuff.
ULRICH: I.. .. I've heard that diversity thing, we don't have black
jelly beans or green...
LUNDWALL: ...that's funny, all the black jelly beans seem to be glued
to the bottom of the bag (laughing).
ULRICH: ... I gonna say you can't, you can't, you can't just have
"we" and "them." You can't have black jelly beans and other jelly
beans.
LUNDWALL: Yeah.
ULRICH: It doesn't work.
LUNDWALL: But they're perpetuating the black jelly bean - - * * *
LUNDWALL: I'm wearing all I know is during April which is national
Oden month in Norway, I'm wearing my Viking hat, and I don't want
anybody to say anything like hmm my little horns, because I'm
celebrating my heritage.
Meade: And I think Friday was national clean up your desk day, I wish
I knew that, I would've posted the sign on a couple of people in the
trading room...
Ulrich: ... I've seen the end...
(talking over each other inaudible)
Ulrich: ...I'm not going to the end this year. I refuse to go --
Meade: -- When they came in with these African things --
Ulrich: I refuse to go to that. I went last year out of curiosity
I'm not .. ...
Lundwall: I walked out during, I'm sorry, when they did their
version, when they when they --
MV: -- of the national anthem --
Lundwall: -- when they when they when they sat, during ours, quote,
you here listen to me: "ours", as though they're not included, and
stood for their modified one (pause) and I won't apologize to nobody
for walking out of there. I really would not.... we have two friggin
national anthems.
Ulrich: Alright...
(snapping sound) Oop. Sounds like tape off.
MV: come on
MV: You know I'm still struggling --
MV: -- he didn't get a job offer --
Ulrich: -- I'm still struggling with Hanukah and now we have Kwanza,
I mean I lost Christmas, poor St. Nicholas, they shitted all over his
beard.
(some inaudible conversation, laughter) (Snapping sound. Tape off and
on again.)
Laughter and unintelligible conversation.
MV: .... noticed
MV: They just kind of showed up....
MV: Well well why not obviously. ...unintelligible conversation
MV: I had I had I had a....
Lundwall: -- Only seven candles, not eight, that's the only
difference.
MV: Yea..got ...the uh
Lundwall: Well it's not a menorah, its three candles...
MV: It looks like a menorah.
Lundwall: there are seven candles, a menorah has eight. There are
three representing the three days coming in, then there's the one
black candle in the center. The three days, you're supposed to think
about what you've done --
Ulrich: -- and that's bigger than the other candles.
Lundwall: The one that where we are and the other red candles are
where we're going.
MV: Uh blood.
Lundwall: Only reason I know this my friend's daughter who teaches
was ... she was a little bit annoyed shed had to give a class or at
least discuss with her 4th or 4th graders, Kwansa, and she was telling
me all this.
|