ValuJet Crash Wrongful Death
Suit
The son of Laurese Perkins, one of the passengers on
ValuJet Flight 592 that crashed en route to Miami, filed this
May 14, 1996 wrongful death suit, claiming that the airline
and its maintenance contractor are negligent.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH
JUDICIAL
CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA
GENERAL
JURISDICTION DIVISION CASE NO. 96-9546-CA 10
BRANDON PERKINS, Individually and as Administrator
and/or
Personal Representative of the Estate of LAURESE
PERKINS,
deceased,
Plaintiff,
vs.
VALUJET AIRLINES, INC., a Georgia corporation; and
AEROTHRUST CORPORATION, a foreign corporation,
with its
principal place of business in Dade County, Florida,
Defendants.
__________________________________/
CORRECTED
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES FOR WRONGFUL
DEATH
Plaintiff, BRANDON PERKINS, Individually and as
Administrator
and/or Personal Representative of the Estate of LAURESE
PERKINS, deceased, sues Defendants, VALUJET
AIRLINES,
INC. and AEROTHRUST CORPORATION, a foreign
corporation
with its principal place of business in Dade County, Florida,
and
alleges as follows:
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL
COUNTS
1. This is an action for wrongful death brought pursuant to
the Florida Wrongful Death Act and any other applicable
laws as determined by the Court. Plaintiff's damages are in
excess of $50,000.00, exclusive of interest, costs and
attorneys' fees.
2. At all times material, Plaintiff, BRANDON PERKINS,
was, is and/or will be the duly appointed Administrator,
Executor and/or Personal Representative of the Estate of
LAURESE PERKINS, deceased.
3. At all times material, Plaintiff, BRANDON PERKINS, is
the son of the decedent.
4. At all times material, Plaintiff's decedent, LAURESE
PERKINS, was a United States citizen and was and/or is for
jurisdictional purposes a resident of Miami, Florida,
temporarily residing in Mattson, Illinois.
5. As Administrator, Executor and/or Personal
Representative of decedent's estate, Plaintiff brings this
action for the decedent's wrongful death in his representative
capacity, on behalf of the following potential survivors
and/or beneficiaries:
a. Brandon Perkins, son of decedent;b. Helene Perkins,
daughter of decedent; and
c. Eugene G. Perkins, son of decedent.
6. Defendant, VALUJET AIRLINES, INC. ("VALUJET
AIRLINES"), was at all times material and is now a
corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
State of Georgia, having offices and doing business in the
State of Florida, Dade County, as a common carrier in air
transportation pursuant to an operating certificate issued to it
by the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA").
7. VALUJET AIRLINES maintains a registered agent in
Florida for accepting service of process; such registered
agent is C T CORPORATION SYSTEM, 1200 South Pine
Island Road, Plantation, Florida 33324.
8. At all times material, VALUJET AIRLINES was and is a
common carrier engaged in the business of transporting fare-
paying passengers from Miami, Florida, and other places on
regularly scheduled domestic flights, in aircraft owned,
leased, operated, managed, maintained, and/or controlled by
VALUJET AIRLINES, and its agents and/or employees,
acting within the course and scope of their employment. As
a common carrier, VALUJET AIRLINES was obliged to
provide the highest degree of care to its passengers.
9. At all times material, VALUJET AIRLINES was the
owner, lessee, operator, and/or entity in control of a certain
DC-9 aircraft, a dangerous instrumentality, bearing
registration number N904VJ which was used to transport
passengers as a common carrier on May 11, 1996, and
which aircraft VALUJET AIRLINES operated, maintained,
and/or otherwise controlled by and through its agents or
employees, acting within the course and scope of their
employment.
10. At all times material, the Defendant, AEROTHRUST
CORPORATION ("AEROTHRUST") was and is a foreign
corporation authorized and doing business in the State of
Florida with its principal place of business located at 5300
N.W. 36th Street, Miami, Dade County, Florida.
11. AEROTHRUST maintains a registered agent in Florida
for accepting service of process; such registered agent is C T
CORPORATION SYSTEM, 1200 South Pine Island Road,
Plantation, Florida 33324.
12. At all times material, AEROTHRUST was and is a
company which services and inspects airplanes including
VALUJET AIRLINES' aircraft and specifically the
aforementioned DC-9 aircraft involved in this accident.
13. In particular, VALUJET AIRLINES had
AEROTHRUST perform maintenance on this aircraft and
other VALUJET aircraft in Dade County, Florida.
14. Plaintiff's decedent was a paying passenger on board the
above-described aircraft, a flight in domestic transportation
between Miami, Florida, and Atlanta, Georgia, and was
killed when the aircraft crashed near Miami, Florida, in the
Florida Everglades, on May 11, 1996.
15. As a direct and proximate result of the crash, and
Defendants' negligence and other misconduct as hereinafter
alleged, Defendants are liable to the Plaintiff for all damages
to which the estate, or the survivors and/or beneficiaries are
entitled, including, as applicable law may provide, but not
limited to:
a. pain and suffering of the decedent prior to death;
b. pain and suffering of the survivors, beneficiaries and heirs
of decedent;
c. lost society, companionship, guidance and services of the
decedent to the survivors, beneficiaries and heirs;
d. loss of support in money or in kind;
e. lost net accumulations;
f. lost value of life;
g. funeral expenses;
h. any and all other damages to which Plaintiff, the survivors
and/or beneficiaries may be entitled which this Court may
find applicable.
COUNT I - NEGLIGENCE AND VICARIOUS
LIABILITY AGAINST VALUJET AIRLINES
16. At all times material, VALUJET AIRLINES owed a
duty to the passengers aboard Valujet Airlines Flight 592
and in particular to Plaintiff's decedent, to operate and
control the subject aircraft, on the ground and in the air, with
the highest degree of care, and to exercise the highest degree
of care to prevent injury of any kind.
17. The aircrash which occurred on May 11, 1996, and
which resulted in the death of the Decedent, was a direct and
proximate result of the negligence and other misconduct
hereinafter alleged of VALUJET AIRLINES.
18. VALUJET AIRLINES, by and through its agents,
employees, and representatives, breached the duty of care
owed to Plaintiff in some or all of, but not limited to, the
following regards:
a. By operating the aircraft in question when it was not fully
and properly operational, including, but not limited to, its
indicator systems;
b. By operating the aircraft in question with a flight crew
which was not fit, proper, properly trained, nor physically
able to perform flights of this type;
c. By failing to provide and/or perform proper and adequate
maintenance and/or repairs to the subject aircraft;
d. By failing to properly inspect the subject aircraft on a
regular and timely basis;
e. By failing to properly test the instruments, controls,
and/or equipment installed on said aircraft to insure that they
were in good and proper working order;
f. By failing to replace and/or overhaul old worn out and
unsuitable components, equipment, instruments, and/or parts
on the subject aircraft;
g. By failing to observe the operative and applicable
governmental regulations and directives pertaining to the
maintenance, inspection and/or repair of the subject aircraft;
h. By failing to furnish a proper and airworthy aircraft;
i. By failing to properly navigate and operate the airplane;
j. By failing to train the flight crew and warning the flight
crew as to the potential hazards involved during such flight;
k. By failing to follow proper procedures;
l. By failing to properly communicate with the air traffic
controllers who were available to assist the aircraft; and/or
m. By failing to operate the aircraft in a safe and competent
manner, thereby resulting in the crash in question.
19. VALUJET AIRLINES failed to exercise the required
degree of care in transporting the decedent, and securing the
safety of Valujet Airlines Flight 592, and operated Flight
592 on the ground and in the air, in a hazardous manner
which negligently violated operative safety procedures
and/or the applicable standard of care, all as hereinabove
alleged, with the knowledge that such violations could cause
injury to the passengers, and with disregard for the
consequences of their negligence.
20. Specifically, but not by way of limitation, prior to and on
May 11, 1996, Defendant, VALUJET AIRLINES, had
actual and constructive knowledge that the operation of the
above-described flight was subject to known dangers,
including that of fire, security and maintenance, age and
history of the aircraft, lack of crew experience and other
hazards, thus placing the flight's passengers at a risk of
physical harm.
21. Notwithstanding this knowledge, VALUJET AIRLINES
and its agents and employees, acting within the course and
scope of their employment, inter alia, failed and refused, to
warn the passengers of Flight 592 of the known dangers
and/or failed to protect those passengers from the known
risks and by failing to take precautionary measures.
22. The crash of the above-described flight on May 11,
1996, was proximately and/or legally caused by the known
and reasonably foreseeable conditions, and by Defendant's,
VALUJET AIRLINES, negligence and other misconduct as
hereinabove alleged.
23. As a direct and proximate result of the crash and
consequent death of Plaintiff's decedent, Plaintiff has been
damaged pursuant to the Florida Wrongful Death Act and/or
whatever law this Court finds applicable and claims all
damages to which the estate, the survivors, and/or
beneficiaries may be entitled, including, as applicable law
may provide, but not limited to:
a. Pain and suffering of the decedent prior to death;
b. Pain and suffering of the survivors, beneficiaries and heirs
of decedent;
c. Lost society, companionship, guidance and services of the
decedent to the survivors, beneficiaries and heirs;
d. Loss of support in money or in kind;
e. Lost net accumulations;
f. Funeral expenses;
g. Any other damages to which Plaintiff, the survivors
and/or beneficiaries may be entitled under applicable law.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against
VALUJET AIRLINES, for compensatory damages, plus
interest and costs, and further demands trial by jury of all
issues triable by jury. COUNT II NEGLIGENCE AGAINST
AEROTHRUST CORPORATION
24. At all times material, AEROTHRUST maintained,
repaired and/or inspected the DC-9 ValuJet aircraft in
Miami, Florida.
25. At all times material, AEROTHRUST was under a duty
to use reasonable care and/or to exercise the highest degree
of care in maintaining, repairing and inspecting the DC-9
ValuJet aircraft.
26. At all times material, AEROTHRUST was under a
further, continuing and/or ongoing duty to, among other
things:
a. Repair and maintain the aircraft in a flightworthy
condition;
b. Inspect, repair and/or replace those parts of the aircraft
that required repair and/or replacement;
c. Make timely and careful inspections of the aircraft which
were required in order to maintain it in an operational
condition;
d. Warn the Plaintiff's decedent of the defects in
maintenance and repair which it knew or should have known
through the exercise of due care existed in the aircraft;
and/or
e. Proper service, repair and maintenance of the aircraft.
27. AEROTHRUST knew or should have known, that if the
DC-9 ValuJet aircraft was not properly maintained, repaired
and inspected there would be an unreasonable risk of harm
to persons operating, flying, and/or being flown aboard the
DC-9 ValuJet aircraft.
28. At all times material, AEROTHRUST breached the
aforementioned duties and or negligently and carelessly
failed to discharge the aforementioned duties by, among
other things:
a. Failing to properly repair and maintain the aircraft in a
flightworthy condition;
b. Failing to properly inspect, repair and/or replace those
parts of the aircraft that required repair and/or replacement;
c. Failing to make timely and careful inspections of the
aircraft which were required in order to maintain it in an
operational condition;
d. Failing to warn the Plaintiff's decedent of the defects in
maintenance and repair which it knew or should have known
through the exercise of due care existed in the aircraft;
and/or
e. Failing to carefully and properly service, repair and
maintain the aircraft.
29. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of
AEROTHRUST, the aircraft crashed resulting in the death
of Laurese Perkins.
30. As a direct and proximate result of the crash and
consequent death of Plaintiff's decedent, Plaintiff has been
damaged pursuant to the Florida Wrongful Death Act and/or
whatever law this Court finds applicable and claims all
damages to which the estate, the survivors, and/or
beneficiaries may be entitled, including, as applicable law
may provide, but not limited to:
a. Pain and suffering of the decedent prior to death;
b. Pain and suffering of the survivors, beneficiaries and heirs
of decedent;
c. Lost society, companionship, guidance and services of the
decedent to the survivors, beneficiaries and heirs;
d. Loss of support in money or in kind;
e. Lost net accumulations;
f. Funeral expenses;
g. Any other damages to which Plaintiff, the survivors
and/or beneficiaries may be entitled under applicable law.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against
AEROTHRUST CORPORATION, for compensatory
damages, plus interest and costs, and further demands trial
by jury of all issues triable by jury.
DATED this 14th day of May, 1996.
Respectfully submitted,
PODHURST, ORSECK, JOSEFSBERG,
EATON, MEADOW, OLIN & PERWIN, P.A.
Suite 800, City National Bank Bldg.
25 West Flagler Street
Miami, Florida 33130-1780
(305) 358-2800; Fax: (305) 358-2382
BY:________________________________
AARON S. PODHURST
Fla. Bar No. 063606
BY:________________________________
STEVEN C. MARKS
Fla. Bar No. 516414
|