On January 16, 1998 Attorney General Janet Reno petitioned a panel of three federal judges to have Whitewater prosecutor Kenneth Starr's authority expanded to look into allegations that former White House intern Monica Lewinsky may have "submitted a false affidavit and suborned perjury."
Reno argued that Starr should look into the matter because "potential subjects and witnesses in this matter overlap with those in his ongoing investigation" -- a possible reference to his reported investigation of Vernon Jordan and President Clinton and consulting contracts arranged for former Justice Department official and long-time Clinton friend Webster Hubbell.
Below is the text of Attorney General Reno's request to the court. Following that is the judges' authorization of Reno's request.
In accordance with the Independent Counsel Reauthorization Act
of 1994, I hereby notify in writing the special division of the
court that I have commenced a preliminary investigation ... into
whether violations of federal criminal law were committed by Monica
Lewinsky or any other individual, as described below.
As a result of my inquiry into this matter, I request expansion
of the jurisdiction of Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr to further
investigate and determine whether prosecution is warranted. The
court has already been informed of this matter and my request
orally.
The Department of Justice has received information from
Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr that Monica Lewinsky, a former
White House employee and witness in the civil case Jones v.
Clinton, may have submitted a false affidavit and suborned perjury
from another witness in the case.
In a taped conversation with a cooperating witness, Ms. Lewinsky
states that she intends to lie when deposed. In the same
conversation, she urges the cooperating witness to lie in her own
upcoming deposition.
I have determined that it would be a conflict of interest for
the Department of Justice to investigate Ms. Lewinsky for perjury
and suborning perjury as a witness in this civil suit involving the
president, in light of the allegations involved in the lawsuit.
I have also determined that the taped conversation establishes
that further investigation of this matter is warranted.
It would be appropriate for Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr to
handle this matter because he is currently investigating similar
allegations involving possible efforts to influence witnesses in
his own investigation. Some potential subjects and witnesses in
this matter overlap with those in his ongoing investigation.
Independent Counsel Starr has requested that this matter be
referred to him.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
Division for the Purpose of
Appointing Independent Counsels
In re: Madison Guaranty Savings Division No. 94-1
& Loan Association
Before: Sentelle, Presiding, Butzner and Fay, Senior Circuit
Judges
UNDER SEAL
ORDER
Upon consideration of an oral application for the expansion of jurisdiction of an Independent Counsel provided to this Court on behalf of the Attorney General on January 16, 1998, it is hereby
ORDERED that the investigative and prosecutorial jurisdiction over the following matters be referred to Independent Counsel Kenneth W. Starr and to the Office of the Independent Counsel as an expansion of prosecutorial jurisdiction in lieu of the appointment of another Independent Counsel pursuant to 593(c)(1):
(1) The Independent Counsel shall continue to enjoy the full jurisdiction initially conferred upon him as a result of the August 5, 1994, order of the Special Division of the Court and all subsequent orders concerning jurisdiction. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 593(c)(1), the Independent Counsel's jurisdiction shall be expanded to include the following:
(2) The Independent Counsel shall have jurisdiction and authority to investigate to the maximum extent authorized by the Independent Counsel Reauthorization Act of 1994 whether Monica Lewinsky or others suborned perjury, obstructed justice, intimidated witnesses, or otherwise violated federal law other than a Class B or C misdemeanor or infraction in dealing with witnesses, potential witnesses, attorneys, or others concerning the civil case Jones v. Clinton.
(3) The Independent Counsel shall have jurisdiction and authority to investigate related violations of federal criminal law, other than a Class B or C misdemeanor or infraction, including any person or entity who has engaged in unlawful conspiracy or who has aided or abetted any federal offense, as necessary to resolve the matter described above.
(4) The Independent Counsel shall have jurisdiction and authority to investigate crimes, such as any violation of 28 U.S.C. § 1826, any obstruction of the due administration of justice, or any material false testimony or statement in violation of federal criminal law, arising out of his investigation of the matter described above.
(5) The Independent Counsel shall have all the powers and authority provided by the Independent Counsel Reauthorization Act of 1994.
It is further ORDERED that this document and its contents be and remain UNDER SEAL absent further Order of this Court.
This is the 16th day of January, 1998.
Per Curiam For the Court:/s/ Marilyn Sargent Chief Deputy Clerk |