Legal News
nav buttons


Texas v. David Graham

"The Cadet Murder Trial"

Graham Guilty of Capital Murder

Texas v. David Graham
Background
Diane Zamora's Trial
Graham Motions Overview
Discuss the case
Clara Tuma Chat Transcript
Live Video
Video Index
April 20 (Pretrial)
April 21 (Pretrial)
April 22 (Pretrial)
April 23 (Pretrial)
April 24 (Pretrial)
Zamora's Confession
Graham's Confession
Chronology
July 15 (Openings)
July 16
July 17
July 20
July 21
July 22
July 23 (Closings)
July 24 (The Verdict)

NEW BRAUNFELS, TEXAS, July 24 (Court TV) -- David Graham was found guilty of capital murder in the 1995 slaying of 16-year-old Adrianne Jones. Like his former fiancee, Diane Zamora, who was also convicted of capital murder last February, Graham will serve a mandatory life sentence with the possibility of parole after 40 years.

Watch the verdict.
video still
Play Video

www.audionet.com
Download Realplayer
The jury reached its verdict after eight hours of deliberations over two days. During deliberations, jurors asked for crime scene photos of Adrianne Jones, blown-up replicas of Graham's confession and the Texas statute regarding confessions, post-arrest letters that Graham wrote to his Zamora and his friend John Green, a map of the area where Jones' body was found, and a copy of Green's testimony.

Watch the family of Adrianne Jones address David Graham during their victim impact statements.
video still
Play Video

www.audionet.com
Download Realplayer
Graham's confession was the key evidence at his trial. His defense lawyer, Dan Cogdell, had hoped to convince jurors that his client's statement to police was coerced, made-up by Graham to protect Zamora (whom the defense believed killed Jones on her own). He said that a staged fight between Grand Prairie Detective Dennis Meyer and Air Force investigator Keith Kyle, combined Meyer's alleged threat to give Graham the death penalty if he did not give a written statement, forced the former Air Force cadet into the confession. Cogdell also stressed that the confession did not support the state's physical evidence of the murder. Under Texas law, had the jury believed that investigators did not follow proper procedure, they could have dismissed the coonfession entirely.

The prosecution, however, said that Graham's confession was not coerced, noting that he had volunteered information about the weapon that was used to strike Jones during her attack. Prosecutor Mike Parrish also noted that Graham took 1 hour and 45 minutes to type his confession himself, carefully choosing his words, and giving details about the murder that were otherwise unknown. The written confessions of Graham and Zamora, Parrish stressed
Detailed case archives at
star-telegraph.com
during trial, agreed on these two points: Graham and Zamora engaged in a plan to kill Jones, the victim was deceptively lured out of her house, attacked, and then shot to death by Graham.

During her trial, Zamora had blamed Graham solely for Jones' death, saying that he decided alone to kill her. At his trial, however, Graham's defense said that Zamora carried out Jones' murder alone and claimed that Graham was not even there at the time of the murder. Jurors felt that Graham's confession proved that he was at least present at Jones' murder

Jones Family
Bill Jones
Jones Family
Linda Jones
Jones Family
Justin Jones
Jones Family
Scott Jones
After the verdict was reached, the family of Adrianne Jones gave victim impact statements. Bill Jones, Adrianne's father, said that his family was grateful and justice was served; Linda Jones, the victim's mother, said that she felt sorry for Graham's family and also thanked the jurors; Adrianne's two brothers, Justin and Scott Jones, expressed a mutual love of late their sister but had differing views of Graham. Justin referred to Graham as an animal but said he could not hate the defendant because "animals are stupid." Scott, however, said that unlike his brother, he can hate an animal.

Parrish was gratified about the verdict and felt that justice had finally been served. He praised the jury for being conscientious in doing its job. Although disappointed in the verdict, Cogdell said he respected the kind of job the jury did and said that the verdict was not a surprise. He said he had told Graham that they had only a 10 percent chance of winning and did not regret not calling any witnesses at trial.

Cogdell indicated that he plans to appeal the verdict and question whether the confessions of Graham and Zamora were properly admitted at trial. He also said that he would base the appeal partly on the fact that Parrish mentioned Graham's polygraph test during opening statements.

top of page

HOMEPAGE | FAMOUS CASES | TRIAL TRACKING | LEGAL DOCUMENTS | PROGRAM GUIDE | CTV STORE | GAMES/CONTEST | LEGAL TERMS | SEARCH | INDEX | HOW TO GET CTV | COMMENTS


Copyright© 1999 by the Courtroom Television Network LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this site may be reproduced in any form without permission of Court TV. Nothing in this site is intended to constitute legal advice. COURT TV is a registered trademark and COURT TV ONLINE is a service mark of the Courtroom Television Network.