Tenn. v. March: Order regarding admissibility of March's statements to police - Tenn. v. March: Lawyer Accused of Missing Wife's Murder

FULL COVERAGE

Tenn. v. March:
Wife Missing, Lawyer Accused

Watch the trial

KEY DOCUMENTS

Wiretap Transcript
This transcript excerpt reflects a recorded conversation between Perry March and cellmate Russell Nathaniel Farris about a plot to kill the parents of Janet Levine March.
Father's Deposition
Arthur March admits he buried his daughter-in-law's body to protect his son (PDF).
Indictment
A grand jury indicted March for second-degree murder, abuse of a corpse and tampering with evidence.
Informant Order
The judge ruled that taped conversations between defendant Perry March and Russell Nathaniel Farris, a cellmate who claimed March solicited him to kill his missing wife's parents, were admissible.
Police Evidence Motion
The defense sought to exclude statements Perry March to police regarding the possibility of a plea deal following his arrest for his wife's murder.
Police Evidence Ruling
The judge denied the defense's attempt to keep statements March allegedly made to police, who claim he was "fixated" on cutting a deal following his arrest for murder.

Updated Aug. 10, 2006, 5:45 p.m. ET

Tenn. v. March: Order regarding admissibility of March's statements to police

The judge denied the defense's attempt to keep statements March allegedly made to police, who claim he was "fixated" on cutting a deal following his arrest for murder.