![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Updated February 14, 2000, 2:30 a.m. ET Openings delivered in case that inspired "The Fugitive"
"We are here today to prove once and for all that Dr. Sheppard was innocent of the crime of murder of his wife, Marilyn Sheppard. Finally, finally, after 45 and a half years, the truth will be told to you in this courtroom," Sheppard estate lawyer Terry Gilbert promised the five men and three women who will decide the case. Cuyahoga County Prosecutor William D. Mason followed Gilbert by telling the jury, "We too have been eager to get into this courthouse and this courtroom to present our evidence." What that evidence shows and what the truth actually is were the subject of dramatic and conflicting opening statements. Using family photographs and old news film, the Sheppard estate painted the couple as loving partners whose lives were destroyed July 5, 1954 by a murderous intruder. The state, meanwhile, portrayed Sam Sheppard as a cad whose affairs created a "powder keg" of tension which exploded when the doctor bludgeoned his wife to death.
He died in 1970, and now his estate, led by his son Sam Reese Sheppard, is seeking a declaration of innocence from a Cleveland jury. Armed with that declaration, the estate could be awarded millions in compensation for the years Sheppard spent in jail. In openings, Gilbert told the jury that Sam Sheppard was twice victimized, first by an intruder who killed his wife and then by a prosecution "based on suspicion and speculation." He pointed to headlines from 1954 reading "Quit Stalling and Bring Him In" and "Somebody Is Getting Away With Murder" to illustrate the rush to blame Sheppard. "When the powerful forces of law enforcement, politicians, and the newspapers point their finger at a solitary individual and accuse that individual of a heinous crime his fate will be a foregone conclusion," Gilbert told the jury. He ticked off a list of evidence, including crime scene blood, the doctor's statements, and Marilyn Sheppard's injuries, that he said indicated another assailant. Perhaps, Gilbert told the jury, that assailant was the couple's window washer, Richard Eberling, a convict who at one time confessed to the murder. The prosecution countered by painting Sheppard as a cad "totally indifferent to his wedding vows" and his wife as embittered by his affairs. He said the state's evidence would prove not only that Sheppard committed the crime, but that he had a strong motive to do so. Mason told the jury Marilyn Sheppard has suffered indignity after indignity as her husband carried on open affairs. The doctor wanted to divorce her, but could not because of his father's views on divorce, Mason argued. "We don't know what lit the match, but something caused the powder keg of marital conflict to blow in the early morning of July 4 when both Sam and Marilyn felt trapped in an unsatisfactory marriage," Mason told the jury. "The powder key of emotion and conflict exploded and Marilyn was bludgeoned to death by her husband." The prosecution asked jurors to use their common sense knowledge of human behavior to evaluate evidence. At one point, he pounded his fist into his hand 27 times, the number of blows Marilyn Sheppard suffered and asked the jury, "What kind of a man would go into a woman's bedroom in the middle of the night and strike her violently 27 times? Is it a burglar or is it an enraged husband? That's the question you have before you." Sam Sheppard's one-time lawyer F. Lee Bailey took the stand Monday afternoon as the first witness for the estate. Harriet Ryan |
|
|
|
| Contact Us | U.S. | TRIALS | WORLD | PEOPLE | ON AIR | VIDEO | TALK | ABOUT CTV | SEARCH |
|
© 2000 Courtroom Television Network LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Terms & Privacy Guidelines Copyright© 1999 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |