State of Ohio's pretrial statement of Sheppard case
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO
ALAN DAVIS, EXECUTOR, ET. AL. CASE NO. 312322
Plaintiffs
v
FINAL PRETRIAL STATEMENT
STATE OF OHIO, OF DEFENDANT. STATE OF
Defendants OHIO
Defendant, State of Ohio, by and through counsel, William D. Mason, Prosecuting, Attorney for Cuyahoga County, and Assistant Prosecutor, Marilyn Barkley Cassidy, submits herewith its final pretrial statement pursuant to Local Rule 21.
Respectfully Submitted,
WILLIAM D. MASON, PROSECUTING
ATTORNEY, CUYAHOGA COUNTY
Marilyn B. Cassidy (0014647)
Assistant Prosecuting Attorney
1200 Ontario Street
Cleveland, Ohio 44113
(216) 443-7785
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
On December 21, 1954, in State of Ohio v. Samuel H. Sheppard, Case No. 64571, Samuel H. Sheppard ("Sheppard") was convicted by a jury of the murder of his wife, Marilyn Sheppard, and sentenced to life imprisonment. Sheppard's conviction was affirmed by the appellate court and the Ohio Supreme Court. The United States Supreme Court declined to review the case.
During, April 1963, approximately nine years after his conviction, Sheppard petitioned the United States District Court for his release with a writ of habeas corpus. The District Court granted Sheppard's release subject to the State's right to retry Sheppard. The second trial of State of Ohio v. Samuel H. Sheppard Case No. 64571 on the charge Sheppard murdered his wife, commenced on October 24, 1966. A jury found Sheppard not guilty on November 16, 1966.
On November 13, 1967, Sheppard filed a federal civil action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Case No. C67-838. Sheppard sued E.W. Scripps Company, publisher of The Cleveland Press, Louis D. Seltzer, its Editor, and Samuel Gerber, Cuyahoga-a County Coroner. Sheppard essentially alleged a cause of action for wrongful imprisonment. The federal lawsuit was dismissed by the district court and the dismissal was affirmed on appeal. Sheppard v. The E.W. Scripps Company, (C.A. 6,1970), 421 F. 2d 555.
Plaintiff, Alan Davis, Special Administrator of the Estate of Samuel H. Sheppard, filed this wrongful imprisonment action against Defendant, State of Ohio, again alleging the wrongful incarceration of Sheppard. This action comes thirty years after Sheppard's acquittal and twenty-six years after his death. Sheppard died on April 6, 1970.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
At 5:50 a.m. on July 3, 1954, Samuel H. Sheppard telephoned his neighbor, Bay Village Mayor Spencer Houk, and stated that his wife, Marilyn Sheppard, had been murdered in her bed. At 6:00 a.m., the Bay Village Police arrived at the Sheppard residence. Throughout the morning, members of the City of Cleveland Homicide Unit, the County Sheriff s Office, and the County Coroner's Office arrived at the residence.
At approximately 6:30 a.m., Sheppard's brother, Dr. Steven Sheppard, and his wife Bette, arrived at the residence. About the same time, Drs. Carter and Dozier, interns at Bayview Hospital, arrived at the residence pursuant to Dr. Steven Sheppard's direction. Although an ambulance was present, Dr. Steven Sheppard, who described Sheppard's condition as near death, and an intern from Bayview Hospital, lifted Sam off the floor and assisted him in walking to an automobile. Sheppard was driven to Bayview Hospital and admitted. Dr. Steven Sheppard limited the investigators’ access to Sheppard. The Bayview Hospital was owned and operated by the Sheppard family.
Sam Sheppard's initial statements to investigators were vague. His statements were contradictory. Sheppard claimed to be sleeping on a daybed downstairs when he was awakened by his wife's screams from the upstairs bedroom. He ran upstairs to encounter a faceless form that struck him on the back of the head and rendered him unconscious. He claims he recovered heard a noise downstairs, pursued the intruder down a steep incline to the beach of Lake Erie behind the house where he half-tackled the bushy haired form, but again lost consciousness. He awoke in the water, ran upstairs to check Marilyn and administer to her, but saw she was dead. During the murder, seven year old Sam Reese Sheppard (Chip) lay sleeping, undisturbed in the next room. The Sheppard's also had a dog named Ko Ko, at the residence.
On August 17, 1954, a Cuyahoga County grand jury returned an indictment of first degree murder against Sheppard. The trial commenced on October 19, 1954. On December 21, 1954, the jury returned a verdict of guilty on the charge of murder in the second degree. Dr. Sam Sheppard was sentenced to life in prison.
The Sheppard family retained Paul Leland Kirk, a chemist with a specialty in criminalistics, to view and analyze the crime scene and certain physical evidence on behalf of Sheppard. Dr. Kirk concluded that the killer was a left handed, weak woman or young boy, bitten by Marilyn and suffering an "open and actively bleeding wound" from that bite. The trial court denied Sheppard's motion for a new trial on the basis of Dr. Kirk's evidence. The Eighth District Court of Appeals and the Ohio Supreme Court affirmed the conviction on appeal.
In 1961, Sheppard filed a petition in habeas corpus with the United States District Court. The petition was granted in the trial court and reversed in the U.S. Court of Appeals. Ultimately, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the habeas petition and Sheppard was released from prison subject to retrial by the State of Ohio. The criminal trial of State v. Sheppard recommenced on October 24, 1966. The jury returned a not guilty verdict on November 18, 1966. Thereafter, Sheppard initiated a civil action against the Cleveland Press and its publisher and Coroner Samuel Gerber, alleging breach of his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. 1983 due to his wrongful imprisonment. That case was dismissed by the trial court and survived no appeals. Samuel Sheppard died on April 18, 1970.
Over twenty years later, Sam Reese Sheppard (Chip) together with Cynthia Cooper, a writer from New York and AMSEC, a private investigative firm to whom Cooper has promised a percentage of revenue from publications and other ventures, approached the Office of the Cuyahoga County Prosecutor alleging that the perpetrator of the Marilyn Sheppard homicide was Richard Eberling. The group sought to have the Cuyahoga County Prosecutor reopen a criminal investigation.
When those efforts failed, Sam Reese Sheppard directed his attorney to have his late father's estate institute an action against the State of Ohio for wrongful imprisonment. The Cuyahoga County Prosecutor serves as counsel to the State of Ohio in all such actions filed in Cuyahoga County. Accordingly, the Prosecutor entered an appearance on behalf of the State of Ohio in this proceeding.
LEGAL ISSUES
1. Whether Samuel H. Sheppard committed the offense for which he was charged (including all lesser included offenses).
2. Whether Dr. Samuel Sheppard engaged in any criminal conduct.
3. Whether Samuel H. Sheppard avoided criminal liability in 1966.
4. Whether Samuel Sheppard was responsible for the death of Marilyn Reese Sheppard.
5. Whether Samuel H. Sheppard, wrongfully imprisoned within the meaning of R.C.
2743.48.
FACTUAL ISSUES AND LEGAL ISSUES IN DISPUTE
1. All material facts relevant to the murder of Marilyn Sheppard are at issue.
2. The State of Ohio asserts that Samuel H. Sheppard, and no other person, committed the murder of Marilyn Sheppard. Hence, the identity of the perpetrator is at issue.
3. The State of Ohio asserts that Samuel H. Sheppard was not a wrongfully imprisoned individual within the meaning of R.C. 2743.48.
STIPULATIONS
The State of Ohio stipulates to the procedural history of the State of Ohio v. Sheppard, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 64571 (1954), through the Eighth Appellate District being Case No. 23400, and Supreme Court of Ohio, and the second trial in the matter of State of Ohio v. Sheppard, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Please, Case No. 64571 (1966), to the extent that those proceedings are a matter of record.
The State of Ohio further stipulates to the procedural history of the proceedings in habeas corpus, Sheppard v. Maxwell, (1965) brought in the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, through the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, and the United States Supreme Court to the extent that those proceedings are a matter of record.
PRETRIAL MOTIONS
In addition to those motions already filed, (see copy of docket attached), the State anticipates the following pretrial motions:
1. Motion to Exclude State's Exhibit 84 wood chip from the riser of the basement stair.
2. Motion to Exclude wood chip allegedly taken from the wardrobe door in the murder room.
3. Motion to Exclude fabric swatch alleged to be a bloodstain from the trousers of Dr. Samuel H. Sheppard.
4. Motion to Exclude Character evidence of non-party suspect Richard Eberling.
The State of Ohio anticipates the following special accommodations by the court in the trial of this matter:
1. Evidence Presentation System including:
2. Monitors, three on the jury rail;
3. One on the witness stand;
4. One for each of the parties;
5. One six foot screen;
6. One technician, full time;
7. Real Time Transcription equipment/software.
The State expects to provide items one through three. The State understands item number four to be available through the Court of Common Pleas.
PLAINTIFF'S EXPERT WITNESSES
1. Dr. Phillip BouffardHandwriting analysis
2. Dr. Tom HollandForensic Anthropologist present at exhumation, injuries to Marilyn Sheppard
3. Dr. Mitchell HollandDNA analysis
4. Dr. Lowell LevineForensic Odontoliaist, injuries to Marilyn Sheppard
5. Gregg, McCraryCrime scene analysis
6. Albert LyterInk analysis
7. Dr. Elizabeth BalrajPathologist, autopsy protocol, wounds to victim, Cause, manner of death
8. Jim WetzelImaging
9. Linda LukeDNA analysis, Sheppard fetus.
10. Dr. Owen LovejoyForensic anthropologist present at exhumation/ injuries to Marilyn Sheppard
11. Dr. RobinsonForensic odontologist present at exhumation/ injuries to Marilyn Sheppard.
12. Toby WolsonBlood spatter analysis
13. Dr. Robert WhiteEvaluation of Sam's injuries
14. Roger Marsters, MD1954 Blood typing, technology, protocol
15. Carl Adrian or representativeThree Dimensional model Sheppard home
16. Larry StewartInk Analysis
|