Legal Documents

U.S. v. Kaczynski
Trial Transcripts

[ Return to Transcripts Index ]

 
 
 
                                                                        1
 
          1                       SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
 
          2                TUESDAY, JANUARY 13, 1998, 9:00 A.M.
 
          3                             -- oOo --
 
          4         (The following discussion was conducted in chambers,
 
          5   with parties appearing telephonically as indicated.)
 
          6         THE COURT:  Hi.  This is Judge Burrell.  Please state
 
          7   your appearances for the record.  It's being reported by a
 
          8   certified shorthand reporter.
 
          9         MR. CLEARY:  Robert Cleary, Steven Lapham and Stephen
 
         10   Freccero for Government.
 
         11         MR. DENVIR:  Quin Denvir and Gary Sowards for
 
         12   Mr. Kaczynski.
 
         13         THE COURT:  Thank you.  Thank you for agreeing to meet
 
         14   on such short notice.
 
         15         I started reflecting this morning on the material being
 
         16   considered by Dr. Sally Johnson in connection with the
 
         17   competency issue, and I began to wonder whether the letters
 
         18   which Kaczynski submitted to me under seal have been given to
 
         19   Dr. Johnson.
 
         20         MR. DENVIR:  I don't believe they have, Your Honor.  I
 
         21   don't believe she's asked for them.
 
         22         THE COURT:  Well, she may not ask for them because they
 
         23   may not know about them.
 
         24         MR. DENVIR:  She knows about them, Your Honor, because
 
         25   she's talking to Mr. Kaczynski and talking to us.
 
 
 
                       SUSAN VAUGHAN, CSR No. 9673 -- (916) 446-1347
 
 
 
                                                                        2
 
          1         THE COURT:  You don't believe it's important for her to
 
          2   have those communications, Mr. Denvir?
 
          3         MR. DENVIR:  We would be happy to provide them to her,
 
          4   Your Honor, if she wants them, if they're not made available
 
          5   either to the public or the prosecution.  On that basis we
 
          6   would be glad to make them available to Dr. Johnson and can do
 
          7   so, if the Court would like.
 
          8         THE COURT:  Do you see a problem with giving her the
 
          9   letters?  Let me ask that question another way.  I'm curious
 
         10   as to whether she knows the content or the subject matter of
 
         11   the letters and is in a position to know whether the letters
 
         12   will be helpful to the determination she has to make.  Can you
 
         13   help me on that, Mr. Denvir?
 
         14         MR. DENVIR:  Yes, Your Honor.  She's fully aware of the
 
         15   history of what brought these proceedings about.  We have
 
         16   given her detailed information about that.  I'm not sure
 
         17   whether she has yet covered all those items with Mr.
 
         18   Kaczynski, because we're not present at those talks.  But she
 
         19   is certainly aware of that, and we can certainly make her
 
         20   aware that those letters exist, and if she wants them, make
 
         21   them available to her, if they're used just for purposes of
 
         22   her consideration for her report and don't go any further.
 
         23         THE COURT:  Let me turn to the Government and get the
 
         24   Government's input on the issue.
 
         25         MR. LAPHAM:  Your Honor, this is Steve Lapham.  Your
 
 
 
                       SUSAN VAUGHAN, CSR No. 9673 -- (916) 446-1347
 
 
 
                                                                        3
 
          1   Honor, it seems to me that the whole conflict here arose
 
          2   because the defense, as I understand their argument --
 
          3         THE COURT:  Mr. Lapham, I can hear you, but it's
 
          4   difficult.
 
          5         MR. LAPHAM:  We had the telephone turned the other way.
 
          6         (Pause in the proceeding.)
 
          7         MR. LAPHAM:  Is that better?
 
          8         THE COURT:  A little better.
 
          9         MR. LAPHAM:  I'll try to speak up, Your Honor.
 
         10         It seems to me the defense argument goes something like
 
         11   this:  that in part the defendant is not competent, or they
 
         12   question his competence, because he refuses to go along with
 
         13   the defense that they have chosen.  They have kind of equated
 
         14   his refusal with competence.  I think, in assessing whether he
 
         15   is competent, Dr. Johnson should have the letters in which he
 
         16   expresses his reasons for not wishing to go forward with those
 
         17   defenses.  I can't state it any more clearly than that,
 
         18   because obviously we haven't seen the letters and don't know
 
         19   what the contents are.
 
         20         THE COURT:  But you have clearly stated the Government's
 
         21   position that the doctor should have the letters.  How about
 
         22   Mr. Denvir's concern?  Do you want to respond to that?
 
         23   Mr. Denvir has indicated, I believe, that if I state the
 
         24   doctor should receive the letters, he will give the doctor the
 
         25   letters, but he is concerned that the letters are in fact
 
 
 
                       SUSAN VAUGHAN, CSR No. 9673 -- (916) 446-1347
 
 
 
                                                                        4
 
          1   under seal; he doesn't want the Government to see the
 
          2   letters.
 
          3         (Pause in the proceeding.)
 
          4         THE COURT:  I'm talking to you, Mr. Lapham.  Maybe I
 
          5   didn't ask a question.  Do you understand the question I'm
 
          6   seeking to ask you?
 
          7         MR. LAPHAM:  Yes, I do.  I was just seeking a little
 
          8   input from my colleagues.
 
          9         THE COURT:  I see.  Well, that's the disadvantage in
 
         10   meeting as we're meeting, telephonically.  Let me know when
 
         11   you finish caucusing.
 
         12         MR. LAPHAM:  Thank you.
 
         13         (Pause in the proceeding.)
 
         14         MR. LAPHAM:  Your Honor, we're not seeking to find the
 
         15   contents of the letter.  What we were discussing is just that
 
         16   if the contents of the letter have become central or relevant
 
         17   to Dr. Johnson's conclusion, she may necessarily have to
 
         18   divulge in some fashion the contents of those letters.  But
 
         19   we're not trying to seek the letters themselves or to know
 
         20   what the contents are.
 
         21         THE COURT:  Let me ask this question.  Let's assume that
 
         22   the doctor finds some aspect of the letters significant to her
 
         23   decision and then she desires to divulge, as the Government
 
         24   has indicated, some part of the letter in her competency
 
         25   report.  It seems to me that in that situation the defense
 
 
 
                       SUSAN VAUGHAN, CSR No. 9673 -- (916) 446-1347
 
 
 
                                                                        5
 
          1   should have input on whether that aspect of the report is
 
          2   readily given to the Government, and so perhaps we should
 
          3   devise a procedure so that we can allow the defense to
 
          4   litigate what aspect of that type of material is given to the
 
          5   Government.  Do you understand what I'm suggesting?
 
          6         MR. LAPHAM:  Yes, Your Honor.  We have no problem with
 
          7   that.
 
          8         THE COURT:  How about you, Mr. Denvir?
 
          9         MR. DENVIR:  Fine, Your Honor.
 
         10         THE COURT:  That means that you would have to do the
 
         11   communication, Mr. Denvir, with Dr. Johnson and make sure that
 
         12   your concerns are understood by her.
 
         13         MR. DENVIR:  What I would propose, Your Honor, is we
 
         14   will advise her that these are sealed letters, that if she is
 
         15   going to divulge the contents or feel the need to, she ought
 
         16   to advise us and we could, perhaps, advise the Court and the
 
         17   Government and perhaps have a hearing on that.  It may be she
 
         18   will not need to do that and she may be receiving the
 
         19   information she needs from Mr. Kaczynski.
 
         20         THE COURT:  I think you're correct.  Let's proceed,
 
         21   then, along the lines that I've just indicated.
 
         22         You can make the letters -- you should make the letters
 
         23   available to her, and then you can make the communication that
 
         24   you've just indicated, and I think that your client's rights
 
         25   will be protected.  You agree, don't you?
 
 
 
                       SUSAN VAUGHAN, CSR No. 9673 -- (916) 446-1347
 
 
 
                                                                        6
 
          1         MR. DENVIR:  Yes, Your Honor.
 
          2         THE COURT:  I've got another question.  I'm asking this
 
          3   question because I want to know the status, at least the
 
          4   defense's status or understanding of the status of Mr. Clymo's
 
          5   involvement in the case at this point in time.
 
          6         MR. DENVIR:  Mr. Clymo, Your Honor, I believe, has
 
          7   consulted with Mr. Kaczynski on at least one occasion.  I
 
          8   don't know what else -- what other involvement he has at this
 
          9   particular point in time.
 
         10         THE COURT:  Do you think he should have any involvement
 
         11   at this particular point in time?
 
         12         MR. DENVIR:  Your Honor, my sense is that Mr. Clymo
 
         13   stands ready to assist Mr. Kaczynski as Mr. Kaczynski requires
 
         14   it, and that he understood his appointment to extend to that
 
         15   point, and if he had any doubts about it he would get back to
 
         16   the Court on that matter.  I think as of now he is just
 
         17   answering questions and giving some general advice to
 
         18   Mr. Kaczynski.  Or he was, at least, over the weekend.
 
         19         THE COURT:  Mr. Denvir, I want you to control
 
         20   Mr. Clymo's involvement.  Do you have any problems with that?
 
         21         MR. DENVIR:  No, I don't, Your Honor.
 
         22         THE COURT:  Are you doing that now?
 
         23         MR. DENVIR:  We've been working very cooperatively with
 
         24   him on that, and I don't see any problems on that at all.  And
 
         25   if we have any problems, we can bring them to the Court's
 
 
 
                       SUSAN VAUGHAN, CSR No. 9673 -- (916) 446-1347
 
 
 
                                                                        7
 
          1   attention.  As of now, I think he's serving a personal
 
          2   function, just giving some advice to Mr. Kaczynski.
 
          3         THE COURT:  You personally want him involved now?
 
          4         MR. DENVIR:  I think it's helpful, eases Mr. Kaczynski's
 
          5   concerns about the examination and makes it likely it'll go
 
          6   forward without any hitches.  And we are talking with
 
          7   Mr. Clymo, and I think it's working out very well, and I don't
 
          8   think the Court needs to intervene at this point.
 
          9         THE COURT:  Okay.
 
         10         For your information, when doing research on another
 
         11   matter this morning, I found another Ninth Circuit decision
 
         12   that more pointedly addresses the need to appoint a conflict
 
         13   lawyer in a situation where the Court is conducting an inquiry
 
         14   into the defendant's concern with trial counsel.  If you're
 
         15   interested, you can look at United States vs. Wadsworth,
 
         16   830 F.2d 1550 at 1510 and 1511.  It's a 1987 decision.
 
         17         I've just covered everything I want to cover.  How about
 
         18   you?  Anything further you wanted to cover?
 
         19         MR. DENVIR:  Nothing for the defense, Your Honor.
 
         20         MR. CLEARY:  Nothing for the Government, Your Honor.
 
         21         THE COURT:  Thank you for making yourselves available on
 
         22   such short notice.  Good-bye.
 
         23                      (Time noted:  9:11 a.m.)
 
         24
 
         25
 
 
 
                       SUSAN VAUGHAN, CSR No. 9673 -- (916) 446-1347
 
 
 
                                                                        8
 
          1                IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
 
          2               FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
 
          3                            -- oOo --
 
          4         BEFORE THE HONORABLE GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR., JUDGE
 
          5                            -- oOo --
 
          6
 
          7     UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,     )
                                              )
          8                    Plaintiff,     )
                                              )
          9     vs.                           )   No. Cr. S-96-259 GEB
                                              )
         10     THEODORE JOHN KACZYNSKI,      )
                                              )
         11                    Defendant.     )
                ______________________________)
         12
 
         13
 
         14                               -- oOo --
 
         15                        REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT
 
         16                        TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE
 
         17                      TUESDAY, JANUARY 13, 1998
 
         18                             -- oOo --
 
         19
 
         20
 
         21
 
         22
 
         23
 
         24
                       Reported by:   SUSAN VAUGHAN, CSR No. 9673
         25
 
 
 
                       SUSAN VAUGHAN, CSR No. 9673 -- (916) 446-1347
 
 
 
                                                                        9
 
          1                       A P P E A R A N C E S
 
          2   For Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
 
          3         OFFICE OF THE U.S. ATTORNEY
                    650 Capitol Mall
          4         Sacramento, CA  95814
                    BY:  ROBERT J. CLEARY  (appearing via speakerphone)
          5              STEPHEN P. FRECCERO  (appearing via speakerphone)
                         R. STEVEN LAPHAM  (appearing via speakerphone)
          6                   Special Attorneys to the
                              United States Attorney General
          7
              For the Defendant:
          8
                    OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL DEFENDER
          9         801 "K" Street, Suite 1024
                    Sacramento, CA  95814
         10         By:   QUIN A. DENVIR  (appearing via speakerphone)
                          Federal Defender, Eastern District of California
         11
                    STERNBERG, SOWARDS & LAURENCE
         12         604 Mission St., 9th floor
                    San Francisco, CA  94105
         13         BY:  GARY D. SOWARDS  (appearing via speakerphone)
 
         14
 
         15                           -- oOo --
 
         16
 
         17
 
         18
 
         19
 
         20
 
         21
 
         22
 
         23
 
         24
 
         25
 
 
 
                       SUSAN VAUGHAN, CSR No. 9673 -- (916) 446-1347

[ Return to Transcripts Index ]


LEGAL DOCUMENTS | HOMEPAGE | VERDICTS | FAMOUS CASES | TRIAL TRACKING | PROGRAM GUIDE | CTV STORE | GAMES/CONTEST | LEGAL TERMS | SEARCH | INDEX | HOW TO GET CTV | COMMENTS