Special Report: A Question of Competency Trial Transcripts The Unabomber: A Chronology Documents from the Case Reports from Court TV & American Lawyer Media The Players The Bombings The Counts Against Kaczynski The Unabomber's Manifesto Building the Unabombs THE UNABOMBER'S MANIFESTO The document that would come to be known as the Unabomber's manifesto was first mentioned in a letter to New York Times editor Warren Hoge. This April 24, 1995 letter proposed a "bargain": if the Times would publish a lengthy article, penned by the letter's author -- then known only as a representative of "FC", a presumed acronym for a terrorist group -- "FC" would end a terrorist campaign which, the letter claimed, included several of the attacks attributed to the Unabomber. That letter was followed a little over a month later by a copy of the 65-page manuscript described in the April letter. The attached letter to Hoge laid out additional terms for publication. Michael Getler of the Washington Post received a similar letter on June 24, 1995, along with a copy of the manuscript. The same day, Bob Guccione of Penthouse magazine received a letter, responding to an earlier offer to publish the work in his magazine. The author -- "FC" -- indicated he would rather publish the work in a more "respectable" publication. Almost three months later on September 19, the Times and the Post split costs on a special section of the Post that reprinted the manifesto in full. It was that special publication that led David Kaczynski to draw a comparison between the Unabomber and his estranged brother Ted. Industrial Society And Its Future Table of Contents Introduction The Psychology Of Modern Leftism Feelings Of Inferiority Oversocialization The Power Process Surrogate Activities Autonomy Sources Of Social Problems Disruption Of The Power Process In Modern Society How Some People Adjust The Motives Of Scientists The Nature Of Freedom Some Principles Of History Industrial-Technological Society Cannot Be Reformed Restriction Of Freedom Is unavoidable In Industrial Society The 'Bad' Parts Of Technology Cannot Be Seperated From The 'Good' Parts Technology Is A More Powerful Social Force Than The Aspiration Freedom Simpler Social Problems Have Proved Intractable Revolution Is Easier Than Reform Control Of Human Behavior Human Race At A Crossroads Human Suffering The Future Strategy Two Kinds Of Technology The Danger Of Leftism Final Note Notes [ Beginning of Manuscript | Footnotes ] Special thanks to Clay Shirky