![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() After their execution, the fight to clear Sacco and Vanzetti's names continued for the
The Sacco and Vanzetti case inspired the Massachusetts legislature to adopt a new law -- Chapter 341 of the Acts of 1939 -- that gave the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court the power to order a new trial not only if a verdict violated the law, but also if it went against the evidence presented at trial or if new evidence surfaced. Sacco and Vanzetti surely would have benefited from this law during the various appeals of their conviction. It was because of cases such as Sacco & Vanzetti's that the Supreme Court under Justice Earl Warren ultimately made numerous decisions throughout the 1950s and 60s that the rights provided through due process and the Bill of Rights extended to the states, decisions that changed many states' legal systems.
Massachusetts' attempts to clear Sacco and Vanzetti -- and its own reputation -- continued as recently as 1997. On the 70th anniversary of their execution, Thomas Menino, the first Italian-American mayor of Boston, formally accepted and dedicated a memorial to Sacco and Vanzetti that had been previously rejected three times. The bronze sculpture, made in 1927 by Gutzon Borglum, who is best known for carving the presidential faces in Mt. Rushmore, shows Sacco and Vanzetti facing a tilted scales of justices. Borglum carved it when President Calvin Coolidge refused to grant them a stay of execution. Menino said that accepting the memorial was Boston's acknowledgment that Sacco and Vanzetti did not receive a fair trial. That acknowledgement may be Sacco and Vanzetti's greatest legacy. Many historians believe that the two men's guilt or innocence may never be proven decisively. But they recognize their case as a dramatic illustration of how prejudice and hysteria can poison the legal system and cost people their lives. Click here for suggested reading on anarchism and the Sacco and Vanzetti trial.
TOP OF PAGE Copyright© 1998 by the Courtroom Television Network. All Rights Reserved. No part of this site may be reproduced in any form without permission of Court TV. Nothing in this site is intended to constitute legal advice. COURT TV is a registered trademark and COURT TV ONLINE is a service mark of the Courtroom Television Network. |